6,239
edits
User talk:Rich: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Registry
(→How are we handling bases?: new section) |
|||
| Line 303: | Line 303: | ||
:: Sorry, I guess I don't really understand the pushback on this point. Keeping those two pages is going to not only require work to be updated but we ''also'' have to recategorize them. So it's adding even more work in addition. We already have a model for how this should work on the ILI. For example: [[:Category:Forbidden]] -- that page is a category only with a page header. We're keeping the ships by class page, which has the silhouettes, and the other two just look really messy to me. Why add more work we need to do when adding / changing ship status is already a whack-a-mole process? :-\ --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 14:50, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | :: Sorry, I guess I don't really understand the pushback on this point. Keeping those two pages is going to not only require work to be updated but we ''also'' have to recategorize them. So it's adding even more work in addition. We already have a model for how this should work on the ILI. For example: [[:Category:Forbidden]] -- that page is a category only with a page header. We're keeping the ships by class page, which has the silhouettes, and the other two just look really messy to me. Why add more work we need to do when adding / changing ship status is already a whack-a-mole process? :-\ --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 14:50, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | ||
::: I understand you already created them -- I'm making the point that whenever we update a ship's status, we already have a checklist a mile long of things to do (change the page template, change the categories, and then update the "ships by class" page) and we're going to then have two more pages to update as well. Seems unnecessary. While I understand your point about visual interest, we already have that with the "ships by class" page. I just don't see the need to keep those other two when they should be categories which are automatically updated. It's fine to keep them for now, but I think we should just plan to "decommission" them (hah!) over the course of the next few months as we recategorize all the ships appropriately and those categories fill up. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 15:08, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | |||
== About the Ship Template == | == About the Ship Template == | ||