6,244
edits
User talk:Rich: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Registry
(→About the Ship Template: new section) |
|||
| Line 301: | Line 301: | ||
: The formatting changes are really helpful. What about keeping the ships by class page and have the other two pages as categories? I ''do'' like the ships by class page, and I think of the three it's the easiest to read, and probably makes the most sense to have the silhouettes on it. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:46, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | : The formatting changes are really helpful. What about keeping the ships by class page and have the other two pages as categories? I ''do'' like the ships by class page, and I think of the three it's the easiest to read, and probably makes the most sense to have the silhouettes on it. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:46, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | ||
:: Sorry, I guess I don't really understand the pushback on this point. Keeping those two pages is going to not only require work to be updated but we ''also'' have to recategorize them. So it's adding even more work in addition. We already have a model for how this should work on the ILI. For example: [[:Category:Forbidden]] -- that page is a category only with a page header. We're keeping the ships by class page, which has the silhouettes, and the other two just look really messy to me. Why add more work we need to do when adding / changing ship status is already a whack-a-mole process? :-\ --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 14:50, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | |||
== About the Ship Template == | == About the Ship Template == | ||
I set the NPC ships to 50% to make them stand out a bit more. Does this help any.. or? [[User:Ceciri|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri|talk]]) 13:23, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | I set the NPC ships to 50% to make them stand out a bit more. Does this help any.. or? [[User:Ceciri|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri|talk]]) 13:23, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | ||