8,273
edits
User talk:James T. Kolk: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
I haven't missed it anymore, so I figured there's no point for having the same discussion on two pages.
m (Reverted edits by Jackford B. Kolk (Talk); changed back to last version by Salak) |
m (I haven't missed it anymore, so I figured there's no point for having the same discussion on two pages.) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Just wondering why the sub-headers are deemed needed given each table just repeats them immediately afterwards. I won't remove at the sec given that it'll dramatically change the ToC but thought I should ask. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 18:31, 16 December 2007 (CST) | Just wondering why the sub-headers are deemed needed given each table just repeats them immediately afterwards. I won't remove at the sec given that it'll dramatically change the ToC but thought I should ask. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 18:31, 16 December 2007 (CST) | ||