6,244
edits
User talk:Rich: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Registry
(→Registry: new section) |
|||
| Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
Regarding the silhouette pages, my original plan was just to use the categories in place of these types of manually created pages. Won't this just add to our work each time there's a fleet change (since we have to update three pages?). Also, wondering about whether there's a way to create on the "ships by class" page a count in each section? Like, "active/inactive/decommed" etc., so it's easier to see at a glance. Like with the Ambassador class, there are three ships but none are available to play, which might not be clearly obvious at first. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 11:30, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | Regarding the silhouette pages, my original plan was just to use the categories in place of these types of manually created pages. Won't this just add to our work each time there's a fleet change (since we have to update three pages?). Also, wondering about whether there's a way to create on the "ships by class" page a count in each section? Like, "active/inactive/decommed" etc., so it's easier to see at a glance. Like with the Ambassador class, there are three ships but none are available to play, which might not be clearly obvious at first. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 11:30, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | ||
: The formatting changes are really helpful. What about keeping the ships by class page and have the other two pages as categories? I ''do'' like the ships by class page, and I think of the three it's the easiest to read, and probably makes the most sense to have the silhouettes on it. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:46, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | |||