2,321
edits
Intelligence Officer Simming Guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Intelligence Officer Simming Guide (view source)
Revision as of 06:12, 25 August 2012
, 25 August 2012incorporating information from the OOC Intel page
m (incorporating information from the OOC Intel page) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Close knit cooperation with an Operative's CO must be taken into account, as SFI DOES NOT superceed the Captain's authority. Due regard should be given to orders from SFI, and conversely, orders that may violate Starfleet Regulations should be reported to the proper channels. | *Close knit cooperation with an Operative's CO must be taken into account, as SFI DOES NOT superceed the Captain's authority. Due regard should be given to orders from SFI, and conversely, orders that may violate Starfleet Regulations should be reported to the proper channels. | ||
*Although not required, a secure workspace should be provided to an Operative aboard a vessel (i.e and Intel lab) | *Although not required, a secure workspace should be provided to an Operative aboard a vessel (i.e and Intel lab) | ||
===Requirements=== | |||
* Permission first, always | |||
* One should be holding the rank of Lt for a minimum duration | |||
* Unless the ship has an active Intelligence Branch, it is considered a secondary assignment, and not the character’s primary. | |||
* There should not be a reference to Section 31 (see Sect.31 below) | |||
* The officer first answers to the ship’s CO, then SFI (not the other way around). | |||
* Sim appropriately to group participation | |||
* Applies equally to NPCs (or PNPCs) | |||
* The unwritten rule applies: if as an NPC, the character holds an equal rank to the player's primary or below. | |||
==Before the Mission== | ==Before the Mission== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 42: | ||
# '''Deputy Chief''' | # '''Deputy Chief''' | ||
# '''Chief''' | # '''Chief''' | ||
==The Section 31 Factor== | |||
Canon source divides Section 31 from SFI, although there is an ongoing debate whether the two groups are separate or Sect.31 falls into a section of the branch SFI can officially claim “plausible deniability” on some of the nastier aspects of Field operatives. | |||
In the UFOP, Section 31 has never been used. It’s proper section is Field Operations and should not be treated any differently. | |||