118Wiki:Featured Articles

From 118Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and features high standards of writing and presentation. It should have the following attributes:

  1. It is well-written, comprehensive, accurate and stable.
  2. It has images and other media where they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions.
  3. It includes links to other articles where appropriate.
  4. It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail.

Cscr-candidate.png Featured Article Candidates

Before posting a nomination here, please tag the candidate page with {{FAC}}
Please place each candidate article title as a linked level 3 header (like ===[[this]]===) below this italicised instruction text. The newest candidate is to be placed nearest the top. Please add Support, Oppose or Comment in bold in front of your first constructive comment in reply to an article name and stamp each comment with 4 tildes ~~~~. If you wish to switch your opinion, strikethrough your previous stance (by surrounding with <s> and </s> like this) and post your new stance before your comment.

Wood, Daniel

  • Support as nominator: Believe this page is how a character page should be, relevant to the character, as well as providing enough historic and present information about the character to build a picture of them. As well as keeping track of the Independence's mission and what the character did to contribute on the mission. --Danielwood7 16:08, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
    • Support as nominator: All comments have been taken under the wing and changed. --Danielwood7 18:11, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
      • Comment: Although I've fixed the majority of typos so far, there are commas, apostrophes, etc in the wrong places, sentences that don't make sense... Not close to perfect yet. - Lt. SalakUSS TigerTalk 19:51, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
        • Comment:I agree with Salak. He and I have spent several hours today editing out the spelling, grammar, and punctuation mistakes and its still not anywhere near perfect.Karynn Ehlanii 23:50, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
    • Comment: Still unsure about the readability of the headers in the right nav; blue on gray doesn't work too well. Also, at the bottom, the last few ranks aren't needed given they haven't been attained yet. Fix the nav at least, and I'll support. - Lt. SalakUSS TigerTalk 17:57, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
      • Support: following nav colour changes. - Lt. SalakUSS TigerTalk 18:17, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
        • Mild oppose: Now I've looked at it when not too busy, I can see a fair few typos too. Same reasons as Ehlanii. - Lt. SalakUSS TigerTalk 13:07, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
    • Oppose: There are numerous grammatical (and other) mistakes in the prose sections, most notably in the Character History, that make reading these passages clumsy at best. A featured article should be free from these difficulties. If these were cleared up, I would probably support the nomination, but right now I cannot in good conscience. Karynn Ehlanii 12:55, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
      • Comment: I'm concerned that there are several times when canon and semi-canon characters and ships are mentioned. For example, I wonder when Daniel would have had the chance to play piano for Lt. Cmdr. Data, particularly since Data died prior to Captain Riker assuming command of the USS Titan. I also wonder why, in direct contradiction to other pages on the Wiki, Cadet Wood served on the Titan. Additionally, some of the information on this page seems to be redundant, most notably in the Counselor's notes and the Rank History. It may be advisable to move the Rank History to a subpage. Karynn Ehlanii 23:44, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Betazoid

  • Support as nominator: As far as I'm aware, this is all original research (as opposed to just copied/pasted). With such a wealth of information, and so well-written, it definitely deserves nomination. --Wolf /talk page 20:55, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
    • Support: This has always been my favorite species page. It's the most in-depth of all those on our wiki, as far as I'm aware. -Jackford B. Kolk 12:55, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Independence-A Crew History

  • Support as nominator: Believed to be a comprehensive list of every PC to have served on the most recent Independence. Stays on topic, links to pages for every PC, includes a list of every promotion ceremony. Not sure where this can be improved at present. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 21:47, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
    • Oppose: Interesting, but I'm not entirely sure we want to get in the habit of promoting lists as featured articles. Shouldn't it be more about written content? --Wolf /talk page 00:13, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
      • Wikipedia has a separate process for promoting Featured Lists, but we prob don't have enough articles to do such ourselves yet I'd guess. Still, a list can take as much effort, or even more effort to compile than a page full of text. It also provides a useful resource looking into the history of the ship, and thus part of the history of the group too. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 00:21, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
        • That's true. And SB118's article was not entirely different. Still, while I realize it requires effort to put together, seems like there's not much that can be improved upon for it. Don't know, I guess I'll have to think about it more... --Wolf /talk page 00:36, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
          • Support with caveat - What about separate featured statuses? There could be regular FAs, like the Karawati page, or Salak and Kolk profiles, that could be shown on the front page and are recognized for their original content ... BUT there could also be a special nomination (Featured Content?) that recognizes things like the Indy crew history and other lists, etcetera for the amount of work and research gone into their creation. That way, the spotlight on the FAs and their content would spotlight the front page and the FA category, but great list-y articles would still be recognized. (I'm a little tired, so if my phraseology is completely off, I'll try to clarify later.) Onewhoisseveral 01:54, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
            • Well not every FA will make the front page I'd expect. We're promoting roughly 1 FA a week, but the front page is an Article of the Month. We could exclude lists from being front page, but not too sure about that. When does an article become a list, where's the line? - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 05:03, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
              • Indeed, AotM and Featured Articles are different -- all AotM are Featured Articles, but I suspect that not all FA will end up as AotM. The question remains whether lists without any kind of prose content are applicable for featured status. --Wolf /talk page 00:04, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
                • I suppose, then, that lists wouldn't have the first attribute of the four necessary for a featured article - it isn't "well-written," simply because there's nothing written. It's comprehensive and pretty to look at, but there's not any real original content. The point of instituting the FA system seems, to me, to be to showcase well-written articles to a larger audience (group and/or non-group members), I think there's too much of a "so what?" factor with vessel-specific lists to seriously consider them as Featured Articles. Onewhoisseveral 19:48, 29 April 2008 (EDT)


LinkFA-star.png Featured Articles

Upon promotion of an article to Featured, its discussion will be moved to a subpage of the articles talk page. The star will be added, automatically adding it to the Featured Article category, and it shall be listed here with the date of its promotion to Featured status.

Article of the Month

Past Articles of the Month

Retrieved from "https://wiki.starbase118.net/wiki/index.php?title=118Wiki:Featured_Articles&oldid=48035"