118Wiki:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions

From 118Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Dernit. Fixing subheading.)
Line 10: Line 10:
:''Please place each candidate article title as a linked level 3 header (like <nowiki>===[[this]]===</nowiki>) below this italicised instruction text. The newest candidate is to be placed nearest the top. Please add '''Support''', '''Oppose''' or '''Comment''' in bold in front of your first constructive comment in reply to an article name and stamp each comment with 4 tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If you wish to switch your opinion, strikethrough your previous stance (by surrounding with <nowiki><s> and </s></nowiki> <s>'''like this'''</s>) and post your new stance before your comment.''
:''Please place each candidate article title as a linked level 3 header (like <nowiki>===[[this]]===</nowiki>) below this italicised instruction text. The newest candidate is to be placed nearest the top. Please add '''Support''', '''Oppose''' or '''Comment''' in bold in front of your first constructive comment in reply to an article name and stamp each comment with 4 tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If you wish to switch your opinion, strikethrough your previous stance (by surrounding with <nowiki><s> and </s></nowiki> <s>'''like this'''</s>) and post your new stance before your comment.''


===[[Kolk, Jackford]]==
===[[Kolk, Jackford]]===
* '''Support as nominator:''' Very in-depth, well written, and detailed profile. Great layout. Honed! --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 20:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
* '''Support as nominator:''' Very in-depth, well written, and detailed profile. Great layout. Honed! --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 20:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)



Revision as of 00:42, 23 April 2008

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and features high standards of writing and presentation. It should have the following attributes:

  1. It is well-written, comprehensive, accurate and stable.
  2. It has images and other media where they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions.
  3. It includes links to other articles where appropriate.
  4. It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail.

Cscr-candidate.png Featured Article Candidates

Before posting a nomination here, please tag the candidate page with {{FAC}}
Please place each candidate article title as a linked level 3 header (like ===[[this]]===) below this italicised instruction text. The newest candidate is to be placed nearest the top. Please add Support, Oppose or Comment in bold in front of your first constructive comment in reply to an article name and stamp each comment with 4 tildes ~~~~. If you wish to switch your opinion, strikethrough your previous stance (by surrounding with <s> and </s> like this) and post your new stance before your comment.

Kolk, Jackford

  • Support as nominator: Very in-depth, well written, and detailed profile. Great layout. Honed! --Wolf /talk page 20:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Independence-A Crew History

  • Support as nominator: Believed to be a comprehensive list of every PC to have served on the most recent Independence. Stays on topic, links to pages for every PC, includes a list of every promotion ceremony. Not sure where this can be improved at present. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 21:47, 7 April 2008 (EDT)

USS Ursa Major

  • Support as nominator: Quite frankly, the best length of any currently active ship page, best layout, nice and tidy. Stereotypical example. Nothing spectacular, just the relevent details and a few pretty pics. As for static, well my adding the FAC template was the first edit to the page in a year and a half. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 20:42, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
  • Oppose: Needs a better picture (that banner is meant to go on the main page of the site, not on a white-background, like here), and the motto box needs to be color-coded better. --Wolf /talk page 20:52, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
    • Comment: Are all motto boxes gray now? Seems like they clash. If we're going to go with gray, why not coordinate the color with the purple of the fleet box/nav panels? --Wolf /talk page 01:46, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
      • Comment: Far from it! They're only gray usually if the little pic has a gray border around it, which I can't make transparant. See the Eagle motto bar, the Ronin motto bar for examples of coloured ones. Discovery's is pink! I like the colour a motto bar can add to a page so feel it would be a shame if all were gray. Tend to either co-ordinate it with the motto bar pic (hence the pink for Discovery, orange for Ronin), or find a colour no other active ship uses. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 06:14, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
    • Comment: Motto bar colour changed to a light blue to reflect the nacelles, but the dark edge of the pic doesn't help it. There's Image:Sovereign.jpg going unused but it doesn't work on that page. Other options are the rotating one on the Titan page or finding a new pic. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 07:01, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
      • I'll check what I have on my home computer tonight. --Wolf /talk page 11:01, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

USS Independence

  • Support as Nominator: About the perfect length in my view for a ship page. Acts as a portal for the pages relating to the ship, as linked from the menu on the right. Has all the relevent menus for a PC ship; the usual nav on the right, motto at the top, boiler at the bottom and pic on the left. Static given it's been decommissioned. Don't like the red link in the nav but otherwise a nice example. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 20:36, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
    • Personally I would change the motto bar color to match the ship nav template, seeing as how it's not active anymore, but otherwise I like the article. --Wolf /talk page 20:38, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

LinkFA-star.png Featured Articles

Upon promotion of an article to Featured, its discussion will be moved to a subpage of the articles talk page. The star will be added, automatically adding it to the Featured Article category, and it shall be listed here with the date of its promotion to Featured status.

Article of the Month

Past Articles of the Month