Talk:Cardassian Union/History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Rich moved page Talk:Cardassian history to Talk:Cardassian Union/History) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I checked Memory Alpha, and this appears far more in depth than anything they have. The alternative is to move it onto their site. However, there is some precedent for long, unique articles like this on our wiki -- take a look at the article of [[Betazoid]]s, for example. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:06, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ::I checked Memory Alpha, and this appears far more in depth than anything they have. The alternative is to move it onto their site. However, there is some precedent for long, unique articles like this on our wiki -- take a look at the article of [[Betazoid]]s, for example. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:06, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::True, but we have Betazoid PC's, etc. Yes, the Cardassian page could be in depth, it just needs gardening I feel. Looking through, getting rid of what's not relevent, what isn't likely to be relevent, maybe then making a few sub-pages if needed. Have it written by someone in the group, rather than posted on here randomly by an outsider who never made any other contributions to this wiki. Make sure it's logically structured, non-repetative... - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | :::True, but we have Betazoid PC's, etc. Yes, the Cardassian page could be in depth, it just needs gardening I feel. Looking through, getting rid of what's not relevent, what isn't likely to be relevent, maybe then making a few sub-pages if needed. Have it written by someone in the group, rather than posted on here randomly by an outsider who never made any other contributions to this wiki. Make sure it's logically structured, non-repetative... - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::: Yes, thus the reason for my wanting to keep it around. Do we have some kind of "cleanup" tag? :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 17:56, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
::::: We have the attention tag, I'll slap that on this then. :) - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 06:36, 1 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Just come across this - merging it seems like a good plan but it might be too long then. Still, with some work a contender for feature article? [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 11:37, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | |||
:If you want to, feel free. Potential's there, certainly. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 19:24, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 7 December 2014
Deletion
The only other place I can find this complete text is here. Looks like it was posted about four days earlier than on our wiki. Can anyone find it elsewhere? If not, I'd like to incorporate it into the Cardassian article, or leave it on it's own and create a little Cardassian "area" for this info. --Wolf /talk page 12:01, 29 September 2007 (CDT)
- I'd ask the groups Cardassian writers to look at it if I could find any. I'll put a mergefrom template on this and a mergeto on the Cardassian page then. Mind you, that could do with a trim, possibly a re-write and being split into sections to. Just a thought, but how much of this wouldn't be found on Memory alpha anyway, and how much of that which isn't would be relevent within the group? - Lt.JG SalakTalk 12:54, 29 September 2007 (CDT)
- I checked Memory Alpha, and this appears far more in depth than anything they have. The alternative is to move it onto their site. However, there is some precedent for long, unique articles like this on our wiki -- take a look at the article of Betazoids, for example. --Wolf /talk page 12:06, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- True, but we have Betazoid PC's, etc. Yes, the Cardassian page could be in depth, it just needs gardening I feel. Looking through, getting rid of what's not relevent, what isn't likely to be relevent, maybe then making a few sub-pages if needed. Have it written by someone in the group, rather than posted on here randomly by an outsider who never made any other contributions to this wiki. Make sure it's logically structured, non-repetative... - Lt.JG SalakTalk 14:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, thus the reason for my wanting to keep it around. Do we have some kind of "cleanup" tag? :) --Wolf /talk page 17:56, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- We have the attention tag, I'll slap that on this then. :) - Lt.JG SalakTalk 06:36, 1 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, thus the reason for my wanting to keep it around. Do we have some kind of "cleanup" tag? :) --Wolf /talk page 17:56, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- True, but we have Betazoid PC's, etc. Yes, the Cardassian page could be in depth, it just needs gardening I feel. Looking through, getting rid of what's not relevent, what isn't likely to be relevent, maybe then making a few sub-pages if needed. Have it written by someone in the group, rather than posted on here randomly by an outsider who never made any other contributions to this wiki. Make sure it's logically structured, non-repetative... - Lt.JG SalakTalk 14:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
- I checked Memory Alpha, and this appears far more in depth than anything they have. The alternative is to move it onto their site. However, there is some precedent for long, unique articles like this on our wiki -- take a look at the article of Betazoids, for example. --Wolf /talk page 12:06, 30 September 2007 (CDT)
Just come across this - merging it seems like a good plan but it might be too long then. Still, with some work a contender for feature article? Hutch 11:37, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
