87
edits
Talk:Trinity Sector: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Starbase 234
No edit summary |
m (→Starbase 234) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter to me. The sector name doesn't get used that much, and I was just using "Sector 118" out of force of habit :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 03:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ::::Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter to me. The sector name doesn't get used that much, and I was just using "Sector 118" out of force of habit :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 03:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
As to Trinity and Acamar sectors... what star names would be found in them... this way I don't mess up again as with Ophiuchus... also I LOVE the Trinity sector nav window... but personnaly I like the star system basic info all on one page with links to any planet with more than basic info...the pre Cart'hen look... but that is just me... I find it easier to work with... I will try and finish Trinity soon... other than the 3 stars in Fed space with no info what else would you like to see??? [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 13:57, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
:Well it's up to your crew what you'd like to see. I plan to overhaul when you're done to turn this page into a Scector overview, each system page into a system overview with the planets linked and detailed on their own pages. Pretty much like Cart'hen. I might split the longer planet articles up too, create a few articles off them. I did it as I thought it looked neater than a long list on each system page. Such a system might be implemented as we're starting an overhaul on [[Ithassa Region]] too, lol. If you're in the direction of Lambda Hydrae, you're in the direction of the constellation Hydra, very close to the border with Sextans (the Sextant). Crater (the cup) and Leo (the Lion) are also close by. Any major stars in those constellations viewed from Earth are named ?? Sextantis, ?? Leonis & ?? Crateris respectively, though you'd likely have one of each at most in a sector. Brightest stars have Greek letters, alpha being the brightest. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:36, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
Also is it Ok to name the sector with the other half of the Azure Nebula... the sector to the left of Trinity = Acamar??? [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 14:12, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
:What do we know about the Acamarians (besides having [[Anassasi, Jessa Kyrn|one as an Admiral]])? Acamar is also known as [[wp:Theta Eridani|Theta Eridani]] by the way, which is in Eridanus. Eridanus is below Taurus, has Orion to it's top left. Eridanus is a very long constellation and Acamar is some way down, nearly half way between the celestial equator and the celestial poles. As such, I'm not sure it's really close enough to Hydra. You might, just about get away with it though. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:36, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
Just noticed that the [[Ronin Dedication Plaque]] and the [[:Image:Phoenix plaque.gif|Phoenix-C Dedication plaque]] both put StarBase 118 as being in the "Serellan Sector". Adding this to the blurb as an alternative name. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-wallace.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 17:08, 26 May 2008 (EDT) | |||
== Ophiucus 70 == | == Ophiucus 70 == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 44: | ||
In that case I will start makeing the changes [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 13:51, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | In that case I will start makeing the changes [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 13:51, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
I'm intrigued by that planet/ star system marked in the neutral zone. Any info? "[[User:Rocar|Captain Rocar Drawoh]] | [[User talk:Rocar|Talk]]" 07:10, 26 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
== Starbase 234 == | |||
Seems like SB118 took over for SB234, or is it a second SB in the same area? Anyone care to comment on the fate of SB234? "[[User:Koloth|Koloth]] | [[User talk:Koloth|Talk]]" 10:16, 21 January 2009 (GMT+8) | |||