543
edits
No edit summary |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Where G is the gravitational constant, M is the object mass and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. We know from Einstein's equations that | Where G is the gravitational constant, M is the object mass and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. We know from Einstein's equations that | ||
: | [[File:Eqn2.png]] | ||
Therefore, one will find that | Therefore, one will find that | ||
: | [[File:Eqn3.png]] | ||
and, so | and, so | ||
:< | [[File:Eqn4.png]] | ||
Therefore, | |||
[[File:Eqn5.png]] | |||
It is important to note that the above listed equations provide for the energy required to "create" a singularity which is by definition, geodesically incomplete. However, the MIDAS array has proved that the principle is very much the same. For illustrative purposes, one will find that the energy required to create a singularity the size of an Oberth-class starship (using a radius of 75m, half of its longest lenght of 150m) is ≈1.464x10<sup>44</sup> J. To put that into context, the entire energy output of the human Sun during its lifetime will be ≈1.3×10<sup>45</sup> J. | |||
==III. Applying Kugelblitz Principles to an Ellis Drainhole== | |||
The most important distinction between a singularity and a wormhole is their geodesic completeness. The singularity's infinite density (and, thus, infinitely small size) result in significantly higher energy requirements for creation. | |||
[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||
[[Category:Starfleet Journal of Arts & Sciences|*]] | [[Category:Starfleet Journal of Arts & Sciences|*]] |
edits