194
edits
EpsilonDelta (talk | contribs) |
EpsilonDelta (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
Starfleet Engineering Corps rigorously pursued a design to fool-proof reverse engineering attempts on the Epsilon series, developing a semi-modular design scheme that deters unauthorized disassembly. Comprehensive analysis of hypothetical and actual missions scenarios showed that the highest probability Epsilon-Delta would be damaged beyond repair would occur by intentional, pre-meditated subterfuge by Starfleet personnel or a member of the Epsilon project to gain access to her positronic brain. | Starfleet Engineering Corps rigorously pursued a design to fool-proof reverse engineering attempts on the Epsilon series, developing a semi-modular design scheme that deters unauthorized disassembly. Comprehensive analysis of hypothetical and actual missions scenarios showed that the highest probability Epsilon-Delta would be damaged beyond repair would occur by intentional, pre-meditated subterfuge by Starfleet personnel or a member of the Epsilon project to gain access to her positronic brain. | ||
Starfleet Intelligence was intrigued by the mission potential of an easily deployable, re-assignable physiology using cybernetics. | Starfleet Intelligence was intrigued by the mission potential of an easily deployable, re-assignable physiology using cybernetics. Though many designs were shelved, they remain in testing at multiple projects currently being developed for the future Mark V Epsilon. | ||
Final analysis by Starfleet Intelligence concluded that the Epsilon Lab modify the basic Soong Architecture, so that in the event of catastrophic circumstances, her design safeguard positronic assets at the expense of external hardware, synthetics and cosmetic function. However, the design primer of her personality interaction routine maintained the final design include several (detailed elsewhere) cosmetic functions. | Final analysis by Starfleet Intelligence concluded that the Epsilon Lab modify the basic Soong Architecture, so that in the event of catastrophic circumstances, her design safeguard positronic assets at the expense of external hardware, synthetics and cosmetic function. However, the design primer of her personality interaction routine maintained the final design include several (detailed elsewhere) cosmetic functions. |
edits