10,278
edits
Talk:Trinity Sector: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Name of sector
(Name of sector) |
m (→Name of sector) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
BTW, I just saw the discussion on Canreb's page about the naming here. I've always called it "Sector 118," under the assumption that StarFleet is boring like that :D And, that the sector was named/mapped first, with StarBase 118 being built there much later and simply named for the sector. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 02:23, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | BTW, I just saw the discussion on Canreb's page about the naming here. I've always called it "Sector 118," under the assumption that StarFleet is boring like that :D And, that the sector was named/mapped first, with StarBase 118 being built there much later and simply named for the sector. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 02:23, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:That idea crossed my mind too but starbase numbers in canon don't correspond to sector numbers. [[ma:Sector 23]] is home to Starbase 173 for example. Also, a sector can have a name in addition to a number, as the Maxia Sector (home to Starbase 32) may well do. [[ma:Sector 001|Sector 001]] has been referred to as the Sol Sector I think. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 03:03, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | |||