6,244
edits
Talk:Cardassian Union/History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Cardassian Union/History (view source)
Revision as of 22:56, 30 September 2007
, 30 September 2007no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I checked Memory Alpha, and this appears far more in depth than anything they have. The alternative is to move it onto their site. However, there is some precedent for long, unique articles like this on our wiki -- take a look at the article of [[Betazoid]]s, for example. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:06, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ::I checked Memory Alpha, and this appears far more in depth than anything they have. The alternative is to move it onto their site. However, there is some precedent for long, unique articles like this on our wiki -- take a look at the article of [[Betazoid]]s, for example. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 12:06, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::True, but we have Betazoid PC's, etc. Yes, the Cardassian page could be in depth, it just needs gardening I feel. Looking through, getting rid of what's not relevent, what isn't likely to be relevent, maybe then making a few sub-pages if needed. Have it written by someone in the group, rather than posted on here randomly by an outsider who never made any other contributions to this wiki. Make sure it's logically structured, non-repetative... - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | :::True, but we have Betazoid PC's, etc. Yes, the Cardassian page could be in depth, it just needs gardening I feel. Looking through, getting rid of what's not relevent, what isn't likely to be relevent, maybe then making a few sub-pages if needed. Have it written by someone in the group, rather than posted on here randomly by an outsider who never made any other contributions to this wiki. Make sure it's logically structured, non-repetative... - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:08, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::: Yes, thus the reason for my wanting to keep it around. Do we have some kind of "cleanup" tag? :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 17:56, 30 September 2007 (CDT) | |||