|
|
Line 26: |
Line 26: |
|
| |
|
| I had thought about that, but we probably need to get the DS17 guide in a respectable condition first... - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 17:14, 21 Aug 2005 (CDT) | | I had thought about that, but we probably need to get the DS17 guide in a respectable condition first... - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 17:14, 21 Aug 2005 (CDT) |
|
| |
| ==Ship Classes==
| |
| I tend to agree, admiral. Though I never set those "examples in out fleet" pages up, so I was a little hesitant to change them. But I've got write ups for a "TONNE" of ship classes, and I think it would be easier to have write ups for them, and have a spot on that classes page that says "examples in out fleet" with links.
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 22:55, 14 JAN 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| : I agree, admiral. If we're only having a picture or two and a list of OUR ship examples, it's not worthwhile. However, what "I" am adding is quite a bit of other information on mostly non-canon classes that somethimes can't be found other places on the internet. I view this as a type of advertising for the group. If we have information that people can search for and find, they might stick around and join SB118. If however, our pages simply dump them to one of the other sites, they may never return. Now, if you were politely and subtly asking me to stop what I was doing, then I will - no hard feelings. If we're just talking about redirecting on the canon stuff, I can do that too. Don't pussyfoot, I'm not good at reading subtext. :)
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 13:20, 15 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Redirects==
| |
| Admiral, I'm trying to get rid of "redirect" pages (they're unnecessary if you link properly). Where was it necessary to have "Challenger" and "Independence" redirects? I thought I had cleaned all of them up.
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 15:15, 29 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| : I've been using the "what links here" in the toolbox to clean up the redirects. Geez, am I working at cross-purposes or what! :)
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 15:23, 29 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Wallace menu == | | == Wallace menu == |
Line 56: |
Line 42: |
|
| |
|
| <nowiki>:)</nowiki> Like the new link on your user page. Thanks for that. - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 02:59, 14 March 2006 (CST) | | <nowiki>:)</nowiki> Like the new link on your user page. Thanks for that. - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 02:59, 14 March 2006 (CST) |
|
| |
| ==Spatial Regions==
| |
| Admiral, I was wondering if it would be worth our while to create a new category for, like, "Campaign Regions" such as the Ithassa Region, the Par'tha Expanse, the Solerian Sector (and all its smaller associates), and maybe even throw in Fleetwide Plot Arc stuff, and anything else people have come up with, so it could be easier to see where a vessel could go for a mission that's been preestablished and partly fleshed out? I thought I'd ask first in case it sounded like (in your opinion) that it wouldn't get used that much. What do you think? <br>-[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 07:35, 11 May 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :Okay, so my only question, then, would be "what exactly should we call it?"<br>-[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 21:53, 11 May 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ==Framing==
| |
| Thanks for framing the Bolian map for me, but is possible to make it smaller? One-quarter of the map is hidden behind the menu. I had it smaller before you so nicely and courteously helped me out. :)<br>[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 11:30, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Saber Class == | | == Saber Class == |
Line 70: |
Line 50: |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:Malavatar|Malavatar]] 18:30, 26 June 2006 (CDT) | | --[[User:Malavatar|Malavatar]] 18:30, 26 June 2006 (CDT) |
| | |
| | ==Intra-page linking== |
| | Admiral, I know it's possible to link to an outside web page, and it's possible to link to an internal wiki page, AND it's possible to link to an item/article within a wiki page by using the page name, a "#" and the article name. '''BUT''', is it possible to link to a separate item on the same page (like further down the page, or to eliminate "see above" type stuff)? [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 23:06, 1 July 2006 (CDT) |