User talk:James T. Kolk: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(→‎Two crew navs: new section)
No edit summary
Line 229: Line 229:


Kolk, I'm struggling to understand the reasoning behind the idea that the Columbia requires two crew templates - is there something wrong with the mainstream one? We did something similar on the Avandar a long time ago, and it just caused a lot of hassle and confusion with new ensigns when they were not updated. '''[[User:Sky Blake|♣ Deliera]]''' ▪ <small> [[User talk:Sky Blake|talk]]</small> ▪ <small> [[Wiki ops team|Vice Chief of Wiki Ops]] </small> 19:30, 19 September 2014 (CDT)
Kolk, I'm struggling to understand the reasoning behind the idea that the Columbia requires two crew templates - is there something wrong with the mainstream one? We did something similar on the Avandar a long time ago, and it just caused a lot of hassle and confusion with new ensigns when they were not updated. '''[[User:Sky Blake|♣ Deliera]]''' ▪ <small> [[User talk:Sky Blake|talk]]</small> ▪ <small> [[Wiki ops team|Vice Chief of Wiki Ops]] </small> 19:30, 19 September 2014 (CDT)
==[[Face List]] update for October==
{|style="background:#f0e6f5; border: 1px solid black; margin: 1em auto; padding: 0 10px; width: 95%; align: left; text-align: left;"
|[[Image:Wiki Ops logo.png|47px]]
|'''Please make sure that your ships Face Listing is updated and concurrent with your crews current roster.''' The FL should only feature crew members with character avatars. :D If you need assistance, don't hesitate to let me know!
|}
'''[[User:Sky Blake|♣ Deliera]]''' ▪ <small> [[User talk:Sky Blake|talk]]</small> ▪ <small> [[Wiki ops team|Vice Chief of Wiki Ops]] </small> 04:37, 1 October 2014 (CDT)
13,525

edits

Navigation menu