Talk:Deep Space 24: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Would also recommending keeping the station as a seperate section from the Challenger, as [[Deep Space 17]] is separate from the [[USS Wallace]]. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 10:44, 19 January 2008 (CST) | :Would also recommending keeping the station as a seperate section from the Challenger, as [[Deep Space 17]] is separate from the [[USS Wallace]]. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 10:44, 19 January 2008 (CST) | ||
==Stats== | |||
Are they from Ditl? The personnel figures seem huge for a station made of 6 Amabassador saucers... (unlike all the other Engineers in the fleet, I DON'T trust DITL, feel it's too error filled) - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 02:59, 4 March 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 08:59, 4 March 2008
Naming
Uh...wouldn't this be more appropriate if it was named "Deep Space 24"? You could still have the Challenger category associated with it. -Varaan 09:39, 18 January 2008 (CST)
- Would also recommending keeping the station as a seperate section from the Challenger, as Deep Space 17 is separate from the USS Wallace. - Lt.JG SalakTalk 10:44, 19 January 2008 (CST)
Stats
Are they from Ditl? The personnel figures seem huge for a station made of 6 Amabassador saucers... (unlike all the other Engineers in the fleet, I DON'T trust DITL, feel it's too error filled) - Lt. SalakTalk 02:59, 4 March 2008 (CST)