118Wiki:Roster standardization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Wanted this for a while, but not been sure how to implement as there're a few very different layouts I like. Quite like the Ursa Major's too, but it might be a tad too complex. - [[User:Salak|<font color="336600">Jay</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 05:29, 28 August 2007 (CDT) | Wanted this for a while, but not been sure how to implement as there're a few very different layouts I like. Quite like the Ursa Major's too, but it might be a tad too complex. - [[User:Salak|<font color="336600">Jay</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 05:29, 28 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
---- | |||
I too would like this to happen, and I think I prefer the Ursa Major's version. But again, how do we get it implemented across the board? -[[User:Jackford B. Kolk|Jackford B. Kolk]] 10:47, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:47, 17 September 2007
By standardizing the roster format across the wiki, rosters will appear cleaner and efficient.
Problem
There's a lot of different formats for rosters, and some of them are pretty bad looking.
Possible Solution
Triumphant has a great template, which can be found here. I've adapted this to another ship as a proposal, which can be found here.
Discussion
Any discussion is welcomed, below this line. If you have an alternate form of the possible solution, or you want to tweak it, show us on the Talk page. --Wolf /talk page 19:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
Wanted this for a while, but not been sure how to implement as there're a few very different layouts I like. Quite like the Ursa Major's too, but it might be a tad too complex. - JayTalk 05:29, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
I too would like this to happen, and I think I prefer the Ursa Major's version. But again, how do we get it implemented across the board? -Jackford B. Kolk 10:47, 17 September 2007 (CDT)