Talk:Previous ships called Constitution: Difference between revisions

From 118Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
NCC 1700-B ?
NCC 1700-B ?
:Look at the canon registries of the ships called [[ma:USS Intrepid|USS Intrepid]]... no -B or anything but each had different codes. Might be that the Conny code comes from the ship after the NCC-1700? - [[User:Salak|<font color="FF8C00">Lt.JG Salak</font>]][[Image:Neworleans-icon1.gif|USS Independence|35px]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 09:12, 13 October 2006 (CDT)
:Look at the canon registries of the ships called [[ma:USS Intrepid|USS Intrepid]]... no -B or anything but each had different codes. Might be that the Conny code comes from the ship after the NCC-1700? - [[User:Salak|<font color="FF8C00">Lt.JG Salak</font>]][[Image:Neworleans-icon1.gif|USS Independence|35px]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 09:12, 13 October 2006 (CDT)
::Rocar, nothing else in Star Trek follows any kind of continuity, why would this be different? ;) -[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 11:38, 13 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:38, 13 October 2006

There is also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Constitution_%28CC-5%29 but it was cancelled and scrapped. - Jay

Registry

If the original constitution was NCC 1700 in canon ...and this makes sense as it was the constitution class... can anyone think of a good reason for why we're not NCC 1700-B ?

Look at the canon registries of the ships called USS Intrepid... no -B or anything but each had different codes. Might be that the Conny code comes from the ship after the NCC-1700? - Lt.JG SalakUSS IndependenceTalk 09:12, 13 October 2006 (CDT)
Rocar, nothing else in Star Trek follows any kind of continuity, why would this be different? ;) -Varaan 11:38, 13 October 2006 (CDT)