Talk:Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
(Discussion added by James Mckenzie) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I agree! sounds like it will be able to customize the "help" pages alot more then we can if we have to do two. --[[User:James Mckenzie|James Mckenzie]] 17:30, 15 Mar 2004 (EST) | I agree! sounds like it will be able to customize the "help" pages alot more then we can if we have to do two. --[[User:James Mckenzie|James Mckenzie]] 17:30, 15 Mar 2004 (EST) | ||
---- | |||
I was also thinking about the layout of Trekwiki and came up with this. I noticed in Wikipedia that they have there mainpage set up pretty cool. We could use tables like them. Also they orgainze there data by category instead of by alphabetical order. I think categories will make it much easier for people to peruse the wiki. What do you all think? --[[User:James Mckenzie|James Mckenzie]] 21:25, 15 Mar 2004 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:25, 16 March 2004
I've been thinking about Wikipedia's content and how it affects our setup. I was thinking that perhaps it might be a smarter idea to actually house our policy/layout/manual of style information on TrekWiki, instead of 118Wiki. In doing so, we will have a larger body of contributer to hone and perfect those policies. Then, the 118Wiki can simply link to the TrekWiki for that information.
Thoughts? --Webmaster 04:15, 15 Mar 2004 (EST)
I agree! sounds like it will be able to customize the "help" pages alot more then we can if we have to do two. --James Mckenzie 17:30, 15 Mar 2004 (EST)
I was also thinking about the layout of Trekwiki and came up with this. I noticed in Wikipedia that they have there mainpage set up pretty cool. We could use tables like them. Also they orgainze there data by category instead of by alphabetical order. I think categories will make it much easier for people to peruse the wiki. What do you all think? --James Mckenzie 21:25, 15 Mar 2004 (EST)