Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
m (FA question) |
(→Double Links: new section) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Featured Article== | ==Featured Article== | ||
So, is the AOTM template going to stay as such on the main page? Or are we going to change it to the appropriate date form, such as AOTM/0408? Right now the AOTM template redirects to AOTM/0408, but changes to the -0408 version don't change on the main page, because redirects aren't reciprocal. Should we change the main page template to the -0408 version (or whatever month it's going to happen to be?-[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 13:54, 8 April 2008 (EDT) | So, is the AOTM template going to stay as such on the main page? Or are we going to change it to the appropriate date form, such as AOTM/0408? Right now the AOTM template redirects to AOTM/0408, but changes to the -0408 version don't change on the main page, because redirects aren't reciprocal. Should we change the main page template to the -0408 version (or whatever month it's going to happen to be?-[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 13:54, 8 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Your edits to the 0408 version appear on the main page to me. Have you tried clearing cache? If still a problem, we'll move the template to the AOTM location and move it back to AOTM/0408 at the end of the month. I'd moved it as a test anyway, thinking the redirect at Template:AOTM would be all that got changed at the end of each month if it works. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:07, 8 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
:: Cheers Lance for the update! [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 17:37, 12 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::No problem, I don't mind updating it. :D Speaking of which though, I can continue doing it, but there only 2 more featured articles in the queue... [[User:Lance|Lance]] 18:22, 12 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::: I was planning to disable the feature, but you would like to volunteer and continue, by all means. My suggestion would be to scout various articles for potential nominations. You and I can discuss future candidates as Wiki Admins. [[User:DCody|DCody]] 18:50, 12 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Removal...?== | |||
So, since I do not have as much time as I would like, I would like to put forth the possibility of removing the article of the month. If anyone doesn't want to see this happen, are there any volunteers to take up this duty? [[User:Lance|Lance]] 13:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Hehe, I take that as a resounding no. I will begin removal when I get the chance. [[User:Lance|Lance]] 19:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Double Links == | |||
There are double links for the wiki information on both the top and the bottom of the page, since all wikis are primarily the same, do we need wiki specific related links at the top? And the wiki links related to the use of our group, like the character and ship related creation would be more appropriate at the top, as a suggestion. | |||
[[User:Sundassa|Sundassa]] ([[User talk:Sundassa|talk]]) 11:19, 19 July 2015 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:19, 19 July 2015
Want to discuss a topic concerning this wiki? See one of the following:
- Community Portal
- Wiki Development Yahoo! Group
Featured Article
So, is the AOTM template going to stay as such on the main page? Or are we going to change it to the appropriate date form, such as AOTM/0408? Right now the AOTM template redirects to AOTM/0408, but changes to the -0408 version don't change on the main page, because redirects aren't reciprocal. Should we change the main page template to the -0408 version (or whatever month it's going to happen to be?-Varaan 13:54, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
- Your edits to the 0408 version appear on the main page to me. Have you tried clearing cache? If still a problem, we'll move the template to the AOTM location and move it back to AOTM/0408 at the end of the month. I'd moved it as a test anyway, thinking the redirect at Template:AOTM would be all that got changed at the end of each month if it works. - Lt. Salak
Talk 14:07, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
- Cheers Lance for the update! Hutch 17:37, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
- No problem, I don't mind updating it. :D Speaking of which though, I can continue doing it, but there only 2 more featured articles in the queue... Lance 18:22, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
- I was planning to disable the feature, but you would like to volunteer and continue, by all means. My suggestion would be to scout various articles for potential nominations. You and I can discuss future candidates as Wiki Admins. DCody 18:50, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
- No problem, I don't mind updating it. :D Speaking of which though, I can continue doing it, but there only 2 more featured articles in the queue... Lance 18:22, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
- Cheers Lance for the update! Hutch 17:37, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
Removal...?
So, since I do not have as much time as I would like, I would like to put forth the possibility of removing the article of the month. If anyone doesn't want to see this happen, are there any volunteers to take up this duty? Lance 13:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hehe, I take that as a resounding no. I will begin removal when I get the chance. Lance 19:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Double Links
There are double links for the wiki information on both the top and the bottom of the page, since all wikis are primarily the same, do we need wiki specific related links at the top? And the wiki links related to the use of our group, like the character and ship related creation would be more appropriate at the top, as a suggestion. Sundassa (talk) 11:19, 19 July 2015 (CDT)