Talk:Cart'hen I: Difference between revisions

From 118Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I should point out that Cart'hen I likely falls foul of the Cart'hen stars Roche limit and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers...)
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I should point out that Cart'hen I likely falls foul of the Cart'hen stars [[wp:Roche limit|Roche limit]] and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers 3rd Law of Planetary motion, I've calculated (hopefully correctly) a "year" of just 32.1 SECONDS! - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 12:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
I should point out that Cart'hen I may fall foul of the Cart'hen stars [[wp:Roche limit|Roche limit]] and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers 3rd Law of Planetary motion, I've calculated a "year" of just 32.1 Seconds, so I'm guessing I've put the code into Excel wrong somewhere! From the radius figure, I'd guess it's a month at most though. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 12:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:18, 28 March 2008

I should point out that Cart'hen I may fall foul of the Cart'hen stars Roche limit and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers 3rd Law of Planetary motion, I've calculated a "year" of just 32.1 Seconds, so I'm guessing I've put the code into Excel wrong somewhere! From the radius figure, I'd guess it's a month at most though. - Lt. SalakUSS Independence-ATalk 12:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)