118Wiki:Roster standardization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Discussion: Just remembered my issue with the Ursa Major style roster, lol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::Yeah, it's mostly just an issue of going through and making the changes to other vessel. Inevitably, someone will complain about people not on their ship making changes, and I'll put out a memo about how the wiki is open to everyone to edit. Then we'll get them all finished and someone will change the color schemes a little. But generally, it'll work out okay if we're able to just get the dirty work done :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 18:32, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | ::Yeah, it's mostly just an issue of going through and making the changes to other vessel. Inevitably, someone will complain about people not on their ship making changes, and I'll put out a memo about how the wiki is open to everyone to edit. Then we'll get them all finished and someone will change the color schemes a little. But generally, it'll work out okay if we're able to just get the dirty work done :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 18:32, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::Oh yeah, and the Ursa Major style roster tends to end up with the posting hidden behind the nav menu quite often, that's my main issue with that. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt.JG Salak</font>]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 03:57, 19 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Looks good to me. Though with 181,500 souls on my starbase it could take a long time to list everyone! | |||
Looks good to me. | |||
Rocar | Rocar |
Latest revision as of 08:57, 19 September 2007
By standardizing the roster format across the wiki, rosters will appear cleaner and efficient.
Problem
There's a lot of different formats for rosters, and some of them are pretty bad looking.
Possible Solution
Triumphant has a great template, which can be found here. I've adapted this to another ship as a proposal, which can be found here.
Discussion
Any discussion is welcomed, below this line. If you have an alternate form of the possible solution, or you want to tweak it, show us on the Talk page. --Wolf /talk page 19:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
Wanted this for a while, but not been sure how to implement as there're a few very different layouts I like. Quite like the Ursa Major's too, but it might be a tad too complex. - JayTalk 05:29, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
- Oh, and I don't like the lime green and blue headers much. - Lt.JG SalakTalk 11:36, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
I too would like this to happen, and I think I prefer the Ursa Major's version. But again, how do we get it implemented across the board? -Jackford B. Kolk 10:47, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
- We'll probably end up implementing it ourselves, there might be a memo out to ships or something. The nav menu colour standardisation went through okay, had a slight issue with one ship wanting a different colour though. - Lt.JG SalakTalk 11:36, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, it's mostly just an issue of going through and making the changes to other vessel. Inevitably, someone will complain about people not on their ship making changes, and I'll put out a memo about how the wiki is open to everyone to edit. Then we'll get them all finished and someone will change the color schemes a little. But generally, it'll work out okay if we're able to just get the dirty work done :) --Wolf /talk page 18:32, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
- Oh yeah, and the Ursa Major style roster tends to end up with the posting hidden behind the nav menu quite often, that's my main issue with that. - Lt.JG SalakTalk 03:57, 19 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, it's mostly just an issue of going through and making the changes to other vessel. Inevitably, someone will complain about people not on their ship making changes, and I'll put out a memo about how the wiki is open to everyone to edit. Then we'll get them all finished and someone will change the color schemes a little. But generally, it'll work out okay if we're able to just get the dirty work done :) --Wolf /talk page 18:32, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
Looks good to me. Though with 181,500 souls on my starbase it could take a long time to list everyone!
Rocar