6,247
edits
User talk:Varaan: Difference between revisions
→Ship classes
(→Ship classes: Compromise.) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:: Hehe... no, that was not my intention. I just want to make sure we don't have 50 individual pages for ships with very little information or information that is better found elsewhere. So why don't we do this: let's have one page for each "type" of ship -- Explorers, Cruisers, whatever. On each of these pages we'll have a list of each ship class in a subheading. For all the canon ships which we don't have any information on and/or information is better found elsewhere, we'll just have a small picture and a list of "examples within our fleet." For all non-canon ships and/or ships where we have the best information or unique information, we'll do the same thing, but also do like Wikipedia does and have a link which states "Main articles: <nowiki>[[Name of Noncanon Class]]</nowiki>". That way, the appearance is uniform, and we don't have unnecessary pages, and it's easy to find the ships. Agreed? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:39, 15 January 2006 (CST) | :: Hehe... no, that was not my intention. I just want to make sure we don't have 50 individual pages for ships with very little information or information that is better found elsewhere. So why don't we do this: let's have one page for each "type" of ship -- Explorers, Cruisers, whatever. On each of these pages we'll have a list of each ship class in a subheading. For all the canon ships which we don't have any information on and/or information is better found elsewhere, we'll just have a small picture and a list of "examples within our fleet." For all non-canon ships and/or ships where we have the best information or unique information, we'll do the same thing, but also do like Wikipedia does and have a link which states "Main articles: <nowiki>[[Name of Noncanon Class]]</nowiki>". That way, the appearance is uniform, and we don't have unnecessary pages, and it's easy to find the ships. Agreed? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:39, 15 January 2006 (CST) | ||
::: The starship classes page is looking much better. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 01:32, 29 January 2006 (CST) | |||