User talk:Rich: Difference between revisions

User talk:Rich (view source)

Revision as of 20:56, 18 August 2016

264 bytes added , 18 August 2016

→‎Re: Category naming

Ceciri

7,850

edits

Revision as of 20:51, 18 August 2016 (view source) Rich (talk \| contribs) (→‎Re: Category naming) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:56, 18 August 2016 (view source) Ceciri (talk \| contribs) (→‎Re: Category naming) Newer edit →
Line 57:		Line 57:

	I think it'd be worth it, if we decide that we want Roster Templates over Roster templates, for example (or vice versa) since IIRC, we don't have a standard naming scheme. I tend to think that right now, for the template projects we should go with Deliera's initial idea and keep that themeing. I've been meaning to find time to go through the LCARS variant templates and document them, since me and James wrote the main one, and I'd like to make sure the variants are needed and documented. Or just even documented. [[User:Ceciri\|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri\|talk]]) 15:39, 18 August 2016 (CDT)		I think it'd be worth it, if we decide that we want Roster Templates over Roster templates, for example (or vice versa) since IIRC, we don't have a standard naming scheme. I tend to think that right now, for the template projects we should go with Deliera's initial idea and keep that themeing. I've been meaning to find time to go through the LCARS variant templates and document them, since me and James wrote the main one, and I'd like to make sure the variants are needed and documented. Or just even documented. [[User:Ceciri\|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri\|talk]]) 15:39, 18 August 2016 (CDT)

			:Hn, those are good ideas. Hopefully that works - I don't mind editing the protected templates for people, but having a trusted power user group would allow more people to do changes. [[User:Ceciri\|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri\|talk]]) 15:56, 18 August 2016 (CDT)