Talk:Ithassa Region Stellar Cartography: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Ithassa Region Stellar Cartography (view source)

Revision as of 15:35, 23 July 2008

5,448 bytes added , 23 July 2008

Klingons

Salak

10,278

edits

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ::::Those that don't, the links in the top content bar can either point to stubs for each body (see [[Cart'hen]], [[Cart'hen I]]) or to the main system article perhaps? No article is too short to be created. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 13:34, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
+:::::We were both editing this at the same time :oP I really, really do like that content bar. Let's go ahead and clean this up with that idea (although I don't know what your thoughts to trimming are. [[User:DCody|DCody]] 13:44, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
+::::::Not thought through exactly how to trim yet. I plan to change Trinity Sector to an overview of the sector as all the systems are linked in the nav (quite deliberate that ;) ). We'll have to work it out I guess. I'm on MSN btw. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 13:59, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
+:::::::I was doing a little test... are we thinking it's own nav panel? There was a thought of doing multiple content bars, one for each system. [[User:DCody|DCody]] 14:03, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
+==Cait System==
+Cait is already a canon location, home of the Caitians in the Federation - should we really have a duplicate in the Ithassa Region? [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 04:55, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
+:This is a relatively unexplored region, inclined to agree it shouldn't be here. Canreb placed it though, I'm yet to sift through all the new additions. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 09:05, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
+::After a quick look, I can't see any reason it can't be renamed. Tur'vin System/Sector might be more appropriate than Cait. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 09:15, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
+Also, for a Region sparcely populated with star systems, there are some busy sectors. I've never envisaged more then a handful of systems in the Eratis sector... if there were even that many. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 09:21, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
+If you take a look at the Star Trek Star Charts map... they have a named planet which I have checked and is the homeworld of the Caitian's... it is extremely close to DS17... that is why I added it... but I think this page needs to be split... it's getting to big and it does not even list 1/10 of the sectors in the Ithassa Region that are close... [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 09:32, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
+== North? ==
+in Space, which way is North? ;) - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 15:35, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
+:traditionally, isn't Earth near the 'centre' of the map? so 'north' is anything above it. gets a bit tricky in three dimensions. [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 19:23, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
+::Debatable. Maps of the Milky Way tend to use Sagittarius A* as the centre of the map, if I'm not mistaken? We know roughly which way the Galactic Centre is (top of map) so referincing whether it's closer/further from there, and if discussing vertical then if it's above or below the galactic plane perhaps? - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 19:32, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
+::: The Ithassa Region sits on the Alpha/Beta quadrant border so it must be on the central line somewhere, presumably at the edge of Federation space. The Gorn (I figure the closest biggest neighbours) are mostly in Beta but i can't find any reference to them being 'up' or 'down'. Maybe just pick one? [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 04:29, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
+:::: If the usual Ithassa Map is taken as read, the Gorn are in Alpha, slightly towards the Galactic Core, but several degrees from the Alpha/Beta border, in Alpha. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 04:56, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
+The Gorn are below the Klingons according to the Star Trek Star Charts... and are completely inside the Beta Quadrant... about 4 to 5 sectors away from the Alpha Beta border... [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 09:37, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
+:And to repeat for the umpteenth time what the Admiralty has told me, we DON'T use the Star Charts for the Ithassa Region. You seem to be making DRASTIC changes, have you run them through the region's CO's? - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup>
+==Ithassa Region Star Charts==
+It's getting a little to big... I think what we need to do is break it down into smaller pages... maybe leave just the sector names and their locations as well as a one line description... just an idea... [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 09:37, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
+:Well if you want to split a few off, try to make sure the pages link to each other. Don't rush, cos each sector can be many pages and they need to link together. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 12:03, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
+== Klingons ==
+The Klingon Empire is nowhere near the Ithassa Region. In fact, I think they're meant to be on opposite sides of the Federation. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 11:35, 23 July 2008 (EDT)