Talk:Broken Promises (Resolution)/After Action Report: Difference between revisions

:The assessments on this wiki page are a summary of the USS Resolution's senior officers' observations and professional recommendations at the end of the Resolution's mission in 2386.  Specifically, the Resolution's Chief Engineer stated the following: "The Embassy suffered heavy damage during the attacks. It seems that whoever did the attack wanted to cause a major damage without destroying the building so the ruin would be a show of force. The structural integrity is below safety limits. As an engineer, i would suggest choosing a different building but the political points that Captain explained on the surface are correct. We must rebuild the same embassy, to show those who defied us in the first time. It will take some time and heavy work but not impossible."  The "attacks" she is referring to are unknown attacks to the Embassy between 2383 and 2386. I think that the Embassy assessment notes can be changed to "The Embassy suffered heavy damage after 2383 and will require extensive repairs before it can reopen.", and that new sentence would clarify the repairing of the Embassy instead of constructing a new Embassy. --[[User:Milesunum|Unum]]  15:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)