24,070
edits
User talk:FltAdml. Wolf: Difference between revisions
→StarBase 118 Fleet: new section
(→PC bases: new section) |
(→StarBase 118 Fleet: new section) |
||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
I'm fine either way. All the forms people fill out and the CON just use ships/vessels as the generic, so I don't really care so much about the semantics, but if you think it's worthwhile to create separate active, inactive, retired, and NPC base categories, it's not a big deal as there aren't that many of them. [[User:Rich|'''♫ Rich''']] ▪ [[118Wiki:Administrators|<small>118Wiki Administrator</small>]] ▪ [[User talk:Rich|<small>Send Message</small>]] 15:07, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | I'm fine either way. All the forms people fill out and the CON just use ships/vessels as the generic, so I don't really care so much about the semantics, but if you think it's worthwhile to create separate active, inactive, retired, and NPC base categories, it's not a big deal as there aren't that many of them. [[User:Rich|'''♫ Rich''']] ▪ [[118Wiki:Administrators|<small>118Wiki Administrator</small>]] ▪ [[User talk:Rich|<small>Send Message</small>]] 15:07, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | ||
== StarBase 118 Fleet == | |||
I think the 118 Fleet designation should only be for those ships assigned as support vessels to SB118 Ops. The category as it is used now is pretty meaningless and redundant with the PC vessel categories. | |||
Yeah, Triumphant should be active as a PC vessel like Thunder now. I think they just haven't updated the page yet. [[User:Rich|'''♫ Rich''']] ▪ [[118Wiki:Administrators|<small>118Wiki Administrator</small>]] ▪ [[User talk:Rich|<small>Send Message</small>]] 15:22, 15 October 2015 (CDT) | |||