inactive
2,402
edits
Talk:CON:The Executive Council (Rewrite): Difference between revisions
Talk:CON:The Executive Council (Rewrite) (view source)
Revision as of 05:44, 17 June 2006
, 17 June 2006no edit summary
(Regarding CAL voting) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Rocar, you made some changes, but you had written into the CAL section a part that said that when there were 3 flag officers, the CAL vote was always included. However, this still leaves us with the problem that there may be a stalemate. (2 flag officers vote YES, 1 flag officer and CAL vote NO.) As such, I rewrote the section to drop the CAL vote in a 3FO/1CAL stalemate situation. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 16:32, 16 June 2006 (CDT) | Rocar, you made some changes, but you had written into the CAL section a part that said that when there were 3 flag officers, the CAL vote was always included. However, this still leaves us with the problem that there may be a stalemate. (2 flag officers vote YES, 1 flag officer and CAL vote NO.) As such, I rewrote the section to drop the CAL vote in a 3FO/1CAL stalemate situation. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 16:32, 16 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Well spottedd == | |||
:o) Thanks for catching that one... I'd deliberately taken those factors into account when specifiying 4 flag officers plus a CAL but had completely overlooked the 3 plus CAL aspect. You are of course right...a stalemate must be avoided at all costs. | |||