SB118 Starfleet Intelligence OOC Information: Difference between revisions

SB118 Starfleet Intelligence OOC Information (view source)

Revision as of 18:19, 1 January 2008

4 bytes added , 1 January 2008

m

proof correction

DCody

2,321

edits

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 * '''The combination of power simming as a soloist (aka “cowboying”)'''
-Sometimes referred to as the James Bond approach, whereas an action taken by a simmer is coupled by two or more posts that locks the event without letting others react or spin the concept. Intel officers (or as Capt. McCall accurately calls Field Agents) in general over the course of their use have been simmed aloof and not prone to follow a chain of command on their respective ships. It’s very easy to take the mandate of secrecy and apply it, in posts that are outside of what the group is doing but reaches the conclusion of the group objective (aka leapfrogging), intended to enforce an end result that must be accepted.
+Sometimes referred to as the James Bond approach, whereas an action taken by a simmer is coupled by two or more posts that locks the event without letting others react or spin the concept. Intel officers (or as Capt. McCall accurately calls Field Operatives) in general over the course of their use have been simmed aloof and not prone to follow a chain of command on their respective ships. It’s very easy to take the mandate of secrecy and apply it, in posts that are outside of what the group is doing but reaches the conclusion of the group objective (aka leapfrogging), intended to enforce an end result that must be accepted.
 What these elements do is establish a disregard for the ship’s Chain of Command as well as hold the simmer unaccountable for actions taken “by order of SFI”, which realistically isn’t the case. Every officer, whether a HCO or a Tactical officer, has a Chief, who answers to the Executive Officer, who answers to the Commanding Officer.