User talk:Rich: Difference between revisions

::Not quite.  The problem is that sim titles don't have specific requirements, and as such may show up on searches that aren't really related to them.  Furthermore, since there isn't a current standard for sims, I have seen a number of variations that lands them on the orphaned pages listing.  If placed within another namespace, it forces sims to be in a SIM: namespace, and won't conflict with a title (let alone search, unless you are trying to search for them :) ).  I could move pages to similarly named locations to avoid conflicts, but wanted to see if this was a possibility first.  Cheers, [[User:Ashley Roy|Ashley Roy]] ([[User talk:Ashley Roy|talk]]) 13:56, 9 May 2015 (CDT)

:::Ceciri pretty much named all my concerns on my talk page.  One of the roadblocks I am hitting with the special pages are where to put the numerous sims that aren't categorized correctly anyway.  As far as having to recategorize whats already been done...  I am of the strange sort that finds such mindless tasks fun :P.  Cheers, [[User:Ashley Roy|Ashley Roy]] ([[User talk:Ashley Roy|talk]]) 11:25, 10 May 2015 (CDT)

== About the old starship class pages ==