15,085
edits
Talk:Trinity Sector: Difference between revisions
→Name of sector
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter to me. The sector name doesn't get used that much, and I was just using "Sector 118" out of force of habit :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 03:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ::::Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter to me. The sector name doesn't get used that much, and I was just using "Sector 118" out of force of habit :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 03:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
As to Trinity and Acamar sectors... what star names would be found in them... this way I don't mess up again as with Ophiuchus... also I LOVE the Trinity sector nav window... but personnaly I like the star system basic info all on one page with links to any planet with more than basic info...the pre Cart'hen look... but that is just me... I find it easier to work with... I will try and finish Trinity soon... other than the 3 stars in Fed space with no info what else would you like to see??? [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 13:57, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
== Ophiucus 70 == | == Ophiucus 70 == | ||