![→[[Image:Cscr-candidate.png|16px]] [[:Category:Featured Article Candidates|Featured Article Candidates]]](/wiki/index.php?title=118Wiki:Featured_Articles#Image:Cscr-candidate.png|16px_Category:Featured_Article_Candidates|Featured_Article_Candidates){kind=link}
10,278
edits
118Wiki:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions
m
→[[Independence-A Crew History]]
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
**** That's true. And SB118's article was not entirely different. Still, while I realize it requires effort to put together, seems like there's not much that can be improved upon for it. Don't know, I guess I'll have to think about it more... --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 00:36, 23 April 2008 (EDT) | **** That's true. And SB118's article was not entirely different. Still, while I realize it requires effort to put together, seems like there's not much that can be improved upon for it. Don't know, I guess I'll have to think about it more... --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 00:36, 23 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
***** '''Support with caveat''' - What about separate featured statuses? There could be regular FAs, like the [[Karawati]] page, or [[Salak]] and [[Kolk, Jackford|Kolk]] profiles, that could be shown on the front page and are recognized for their original content ... BUT there could also be a special nomination (Featured Content?) that recognizes things like the Indy crew history and other lists, etcetera for the amount of work and research gone into their creation. That way, the spotlight on the FAs and their content would spotlight the front page and the FA category, but great list-y articles would still be recognized. (I'm a little tired, so if my phraseology is completely off, I'll try to clarify later.) [[User:Onewhoisseveral|Onewhoisseveral]] 01:54, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ***** '''Support with caveat''' - What about separate featured statuses? There could be regular FAs, like the [[Karawati]] page, or [[Salak]] and [[Kolk, Jackford|Kolk]] profiles, that could be shown on the front page and are recognized for their original content ... BUT there could also be a special nomination (Featured Content?) that recognizes things like the Indy crew history and other lists, etcetera for the amount of work and research gone into their creation. That way, the spotlight on the FAs and their content would spotlight the front page and the FA category, but great list-y articles would still be recognized. (I'm a little tired, so if my phraseology is completely off, I'll try to clarify later.) [[User:Onewhoisseveral|Onewhoisseveral]] 01:54, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
****** Well not every FA will make the front page I'd expect. We're promoting roughly 1 FA a week, but the front page is an Article of the Month. We could exclude lists from being front page, but not too sure about that. When does an article become a list, where's the line? - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 05:03, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | |||
===[[USS Ursa Major]]=== | ===[[USS Ursa Major]]=== | ||