inactive
2,402
edits
Talk:Laudean/Language: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
:If you check out the [[Ancient Laudean Lexicon]], you'll see that "jiu" is the word for "snow", not "man". su'lade is "male" or "man". This may screw up your following argument. ALSO, I was thinking that there could be three levels of language - Modern Laudean, Old Laudean, and Ancient Laudean. There would be a huge gap between the Ancient and the Old (via "dark ages") and so words and meanings get changed. Modern would be much closer to simply Old Laudean. Thoughts? -[[User:Varaan|Varaan]], 20 MAR 2006, 16:16 EST | :If you check out the [[Ancient Laudean Lexicon]], you'll see that "jiu" is the word for "snow", not "man". su'lade is "male" or "man". This may screw up your following argument. ALSO, I was thinking that there could be three levels of language - Modern Laudean, Old Laudean, and Ancient Laudean. There would be a huge gap between the Ancient and the Old (via "dark ages") and so words and meanings get changed. Modern would be much closer to simply Old Laudean. Thoughts? -[[User:Varaan|Varaan]], 20 MAR 2006, 16:16 EST | ||
==Problems== | |||
Well these changes will need to be made to the English to Laudean Dictionary then as I got snow and man mixed up. | Well these changes will need to be made to the English to Laudean Dictionary then as I got snow and man mixed up. | ||
| Line 116: | Line 119: | ||
It also seems like three times more work than to simply create one language, so personally I'd advocate listing a modern version of the word everytime it is created in the Ancient tongue. | It also seems like three times more work than to simply create one language, so personally I'd advocate listing a modern version of the word everytime it is created in the Ancient tongue. | ||
-Rocar | |||