|
|
| Line 34: |
Line 34: |
| : '''Comment''': Agreed -- all the bolding needs to go. Add a list at the bottom for the members, as well. :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 01:07, 16 December 2008 (EST) | | : '''Comment''': Agreed -- all the bolding needs to go. Add a list at the bottom for the members, as well. :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 01:07, 16 December 2008 (EST) |
| : '''Comment''': Likewise. I really like the article & think it's fun. No problem with the wiki links but the bold type all over the place does jar a bit. [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 12:54, 17 January 2009 (EST) | | : '''Comment''': Likewise. I really like the article & think it's fun. No problem with the wiki links but the bold type all over the place does jar a bit. [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 12:54, 17 January 2009 (EST) |
|
| |
| ===[[Previous ships called Independence]]===
| |
| '''Support as Nominator''': One that I rewrote from the ground up a little while ago. However, it shows a summary of each ship to have borne the name, a pic for most of them (none could be found for the earliest ones), hopefully insightful prose into the history of a name that has long been a presence in both the US Navy and more recently the UFOP fleet. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt Cmdr. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 14:52, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| : '''Comment'''': I'd recommend using the "thumb" or "frame" tags for the images to clean them up. Also, perhaps using the subtitles as links to the ships, instead put a "Main article..." indented link, even if it's on WP? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 00:57, 16 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| ::'''Response''': I've always found "Thumb" looks ugly on the page, while frame seems to be incompatable with scaling, which is used in every single one of the pics. As such, I'm very hesitant to use thumb and frame is impractical. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt Cmdr. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 12:55, 30 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| ::: Thumbnails are still the best way to size an image with a caption. I think we should stick with that. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 13:29, 30 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| :'''Support''': I think the pics look fine and this is definitely the best example of a 'Previous Ships...'
| |
| article I've seen. I like having a mixture of Featured Articles & think this one fits the bill - well-researched, good example of how Trek fits in with the 'real world'. [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 13:00, 17 January 2009 (EST)
| |
| :'''Support''': The pictures don't appear to scream at me, and the article is well-written and concise. I can't find much, if anything wrong. [[User:Lance|Lance]] 13:33, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==[[Image:Cscr-candidate.png|16px]] Featured Article Review== | | ==[[Image:Cscr-candidate.png|16px]] Featured Article Review== |