Talk:Starchart, UFOP: Difference between revisions

Talk:Starchart, UFOP (view source)

Revision as of 23:21, 20 January 2009

26 bytes added , 20 January 2009

m

→‎Tholian Positioning

Koloth

87

edits

Revision as of 23:20, 20 January 2009 (view source) Koloth (talk \| contribs) (Tholian Positioning) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:21, 20 January 2009 (view source) Koloth (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Tholian Positioning) Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	This map is non-canon in origin orginating from the very excellent work of [http://www.stdimension.org/int/Cartography/cartography.htm Star Trek Dimension]. Tholian's are without doubt Alpha Quadrant species ([http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Tholian +]) yet this map shows the Tholians to be more native to the Beta Quadrant. While you could say that both Romulan and Klingons are sometimes referenced as Alpha Quadrant species due to their empires spilling over into the Quadrant other, more canon, references (Star Trek Star Charts: The Complete Atlas of Star Trek) show the Tholian Empire to be in the Alpha Quadrant just below the Cardassian Empire (see [http://www.ucip.org/science/newmaps/alpha.jpg here]).		This map is non-canon in origin orginating from the very excellent work of [http://www.stdimension.org/int/Cartography/cartography.htm Star Trek Dimension]. Tholian's are without doubt Alpha Quadrant species ([http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Tholian +]) yet this map shows the Tholians to be more native to the Beta Quadrant. While you could say that both Romulan and Klingons are sometimes referenced as Alpha Quadrant species due to their empires spilling over into the Quadrant other, more canon, references (Star Trek Star Charts: The Complete Atlas of Star Trek) show the Tholian Empire to be in the Alpha Quadrant just below the Cardassian Empire (see [http://www.ucip.org/science/newmaps/alpha.jpg here]).

	Perhaps we need to revise the use of the map provided by Star Trek Dimension?		Perhaps we need to revise the use of the map provided by Star Trek Dimension? - Koloth, 21 January 2009