6,244
edits
User talk:Salak/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
Tiger deck layout
m (→Template) |
(Tiger deck layout) |
||
| Line 286: | Line 286: | ||
==Trinity== | ==Trinity== | ||
I am almost finished working on the Trinity Sector... just working on the Romulan systems now... I was thinking that we should delete the systems from the nav window... Also now that I was able to add a image of just the Trinity sector each system should have a brief 1 or 2 line description after a 1 line description of it's location on the Trinity Sector map... that way someone can scroll down and look at a system then scroll up to find it on the map... no need to flip back and forth between pages... [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 10:32, 4 May 2008 (EDT) | I am almost finished working on the Trinity Sector... just working on the Romulan systems now... I was thinking that we should delete the systems from the nav window... Also now that I was able to add a image of just the Trinity sector each system should have a brief 1 or 2 line description after a 1 line description of it's location on the Trinity Sector map... that way someone can scroll down and look at a system then scroll up to find it on the map... no need to flip back and forth between pages... [[User:Canreb|Canreb]] 10:32, 4 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Tiger deck layout == | |||
One of the important parts of the deck layout that we always played on the Phoenix-C was the staircase behind the viewscreen leading down to the CO/FO quarters -- no way to access them directly via turbolift. You may also want to review the Phoenix deck layout to see how the "Bridge Module"/Port/Starboard deck layouts figure in. That table was setup to show how the unique deck layout separates areas that may be on the same deck. (i.e.- can't get to cargo bay 1 from cargo bay 4, without going down to deck 5 first.) Scrutinize [[:Image:Steam detail.gif|this image]] for more clarity on the subject. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 20:07, 5 May 2008 (EDT) | |||