User talk:Varaan: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Ship classes: Not for non-canon stuff.
(Ship classes)
(→‎Ship classes: Not for non-canon stuff.)
Line 10: Line 10:


== Ship classes ==
== Ship classes ==
Wouldn't we be better off just putting all the ships on one page, each with a subheading or something? I think the only time we really need a whole page for a vessel is when it's non-canon. Seems a bit superfluous to have all these ship pages that just have "examples within our fleet" when we can put all of them into a page with subheadings. Thoughts? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 19:05, 14 January 2006 (CST)


Wouldn't we be better off just putting all the ships on one page, each with a subheading or something? I think the only time we really need a whole page for a vessel is when it's non-canon. Seems a bit superfluous to have all these ship pages that just have "examples within our fleet" when we can put all of them into a page with subheadings. Thoughts? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 19:05, 14 January 2006 (CST)
: Well, if you remember the discussion we had with Maximoff, I'm really not interested in having all of the canon stuff on this wiki, because there are other places (DITL.org, MemoryAlpha, Wikipedia) that have better, more complete listings for these things. So, if we do want to have a ''list'' of ship classes on here, that's fine by me. My only objection is that we don't need a seperate page for each ship class if there's only "examples within our fleet" and a picture or two. They can all go on one page, then, and make it easier to access all the information. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:05, 15 January 2006 (CST)

Navigation menu