118Wiki:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions

From 118Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
:'''Support''': Nice, detailed article. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt Cmdr. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 19:38, 15 December 2008 (EST)
:'''Support''': Nice, detailed article. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt Cmdr. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-PhoenixC.jpg|30px|USS Tiger]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 19:38, 15 December 2008 (EST)
:'''Comment''': I agree with Salak that the article is nicely detailed and certainly gives a very god feel for the character. I enjoyed reading it. However, my only gripe is the fact that it's an awful lot in one go and might be better spread over a couple of pages. [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 12:48, 17 January 2009 (EST)
:'''Comment''': I agree with Salak that the article is nicely detailed and certainly gives a very god feel for the character. I enjoyed reading it. However, my only gripe is the fact that it's an awful lot in one go and might be better spread over a couple of pages. [[User:Hutch|Hutch]] 12:48, 17 January 2009 (EST)
'''Comment''': Inlight of looking at the article i have decided to place records for my character on a subpage, making it easier for the reader to read and digest, and allowing for further detail if they need it. --[[User:Danielwood7|Danielwood7]] 17:38, 17 January 2009 (EST)


===[[Warp Drive and the Ithassa Five]]===
===[[Warp Drive and the Ithassa Five]]===

Revision as of 22:38, 17 January 2009

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and features high standards of writing and presentation. The content of a featured article should be of a standard where it can be held up as an example for people trying to develop other articles of a similar theme. It should have the following attributes:

  1. It is well-written, comprehensive and accurate.
  2. It has images and other media where they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions.
  3. It includes links to other articles where appropriate.
  4. It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail.

Cscr-candidate.png Featured Article Candidates

Before posting a nomination here, please tag the candidate page with {{FAC}}
Please place each candidate article title as a linked level 3 header (like ===[[this]]===) below this italicised instruction text. The newest candidate is to be placed nearest the top. Please add Support, Oppose or Comment in bold in front of your first constructive comment in reply to an article name and stamp each comment with 4 tildes ~~~~. If you wish to switch your opinion, strikethrough your previous stance (by surrounding with <s> and </s> like this) and post your new stance before your comment.

Lt. Cmdr Quinn Reynolds

Support as Nominator: This seems to have been a bit quiet of late so I thought I'd nominate another article and have a read of the others. Quinn's profile is another fine example of a character bio. It shows the potential of the 118wiki, how far you can expand your character history if you want. It has a good layout, too, spread over a few pages that don't overwhelm the reader with too much info at once. Hutch 12:42, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Support: I agree. This is a great example of a character page. I especially like the pictures that are throughout her page. Flows well. Alana 13:22, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Lt. Daniel Wood

Support as Nominator: I believe this to be a very in-depth article regarding my character, some believe it to be too in-depth and possibly too much, however it shows everything a Starfleet Record would, just by looking at this page I believe that a picture can be built of the type of person my character is. It’s taken a lot of time and effort to work out the little details but I believe they compliment the bio to a degree of professionalism. I’ve taken previous criticism into consideration and built upon it hopefully giving a final Bio.--Danielwood7 17:43, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Support: Nice, detailed article. - Lt Cmdr. SalakUSS TigerTalk 19:38, 15 December 2008 (EST)
Comment: I agree with Salak that the article is nicely detailed and certainly gives a very god feel for the character. I enjoyed reading it. However, my only gripe is the fact that it's an awful lot in one go and might be better spread over a couple of pages. Hutch 12:48, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Comment: Inlight of looking at the article i have decided to place records for my character on a subpage, making it easier for the reader to read and digest, and allowing for further detail if they need it. --Danielwood7 17:38, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Warp Drive and the Ithassa Five

Support as Nominator: A wonderfully in-depth and thoughtful article about a band on the periphery of simming. Ethan may have just made them up, but if you read this article, you'd never know it. If we can create articles like this about a band that showed up at an inter-ship celebration one night, just think of the kind of insightful and enlightening articles we could create about characters and things we sim about every day! Great Job, Ethan! -Lt. Kolk 17:14, 26 October 2008 (EDT)

Comment: Probably should be a page on it's own rather than a sub-page. Good level of detail but needs to be copy-edited for typos, overuse of bold text & things like inter-wiki links. Just added a category and changed another. Not far off at the moment though. - Lt Cmdr. SalakUSS TigerTalk 17:22, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
Comment: Agreed -- all the bolding needs to go. Add a list at the bottom for the members, as well. :) --Wolf /talk page 01:07, 16 December 2008 (EST)
Comment: Likewise. I really like the article & think it's fun. No problem with the wiki links but the bold type all over the place does jar a bit. Hutch 12:54, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Previous ships called Independence

Support as Nominator: One that I rewrote from the ground up a little while ago. However, it shows a summary of each ship to have borne the name, a pic for most of them (none could be found for the earliest ones), hopefully insightful prose into the history of a name that has long been a presence in both the US Navy and more recently the UFOP fleet. - Lt Cmdr. SalakUSS TigerTalk 14:52, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

Comment': I'd recommend using the "thumb" or "frame" tags for the images to clean them up. Also, perhaps using the subtitles as links to the ships, instead put a "Main article..." indented link, even if it's on WP? --Wolf /talk page 00:57, 16 December 2008 (EST)
Response: I've always found "Thumb" looks ugly on the page, while frame seems to be incompatable with scaling, which is used in every single one of the pics. As such, I'm very hesitant to use thumb and frame is impractical. - Lt Cmdr. SalakUSS TigerTalk 12:55, 30 December 2008 (EST)
Thumbnails are still the best way to size an image with a caption. I think we should stick with that. --Wolf /talk page 13:29, 30 December 2008 (EST)
Support: I think the pics look fine and this is definitely the best example of a 'Previous Ships...'

article I've seen. I like having a mixture of Featured Articles & think this one fits the bill - well-researched, good example of how Trek fits in with the 'real world'. Hutch 13:00, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Cscr-candidate.png Featured Article Review

This section is for the re-evalution of existing Featured Articles, in the event that an existing Featured Article is felt to fall below the expected standards. Please use constructive comments to suggest improvements to articles listed here. An article that fails a Review will lose its Featured Status. An article can not fail unless there is a majority of two supporting demotion. As retention is preferred to removal, please change your vote if the article has improved sufficiently.
Before posting a nomination here, please tag the candidate page with {{FAR}}
Please place each article title as a linked level 3 header (like ===[[this]]===) below this italicised instruction text. The newest discussion is to be placed nearest the top. Please add Retain, Demote or Comment in bold in front of your first constructive comment in reply to an article name and stamp each comment with 4 tildes ~~~~. If you wish to switch your opinion, strikethrough your previous stance (by surrounding with <s> and </s> like this) and post your new stance before your comment.
As with Featured Article Candidates, A Review listing will be closed after one month if a clear consensus has not been met. Articles nominated for review should not be withdrawn from the process except by an Admin in the event of a consensus.

LinkFA-star.png Featured Articles

Upon promotion of an article to Featured, its discussion will be moved to a subpage of the articles talk page. The star will be added, automatically adding it to the Featured Article category, and it shall be listed here with the date of its promotion to Featured status.

LinkFA-star.png Article of the Month

The Article of the Month is a Featured article which is chosen to appear on the front page of both the wiki and the main members area website as an example of what can be done on the wiki. The aim is to hold these articles up as examples, to show others what they can do and hopefully inspire them to attempt to replicate such with other articles. It is also a way of recognising the effort put into writing such pages.

Given their prominent position, these articles should be a good advertisement for both the wiki and the fleet as a whole. At present, the Article of the Month is chosen by simply selecting the next newest Featured Article, though "Salak" is being held back until last due to the subject matter being the primary character of a wiki admin.

Past Articles of the Month