User talk:FltAdml. Wolf

From 118Wiki
Revision as of 16:20, 9 February 2006 by Salak (talk | contribs) (Wallace menu)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

New page: Creation and Upkeep of Ship Histories

New Page

The Fighter Guide

subpages

Hmmm subpages seem far more appropriate don't you think? Meekohi 07:11, 14 Jul 2005 (CDT)

Ooo thanks for doing it for me though ;)

ILI

I can't edit the ILI list... Aenar are missing from the list, I've made a basic page for them

Thanks, I'll bear that in mind, although all I personaly have borrowed from Memory Alpha so far is the Aenar picture. - Jay 14:48, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)

I did notice that and corrected as quickly as humanely possible - Jay 14:50, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)

User Page

Sorry about that - will be keeping Pietmaximoff then. It didn't strike me until after I made the new UserName that I didn't really need it anyway. --Lt Pietro Maximoff 07:16, 16 Aug 2005 (CDT)

Training Area

Admiral, the tutorials section and the mission section should be separate, don't you think? Could we have a mission section too? (Varaan)

Parker and I had written up two new missions, long ago when we were talking about "spring cleaning" the missions area. We each had one run through and then the entire project got shelved. (Varaan)

Guide to USS Wallace

I had thought about that, but we probably need to get the DS17 guide in a respectable condition first... - Jay 17:14, 21 Aug 2005 (CDT)

"Er...which station?"

Admiral, as it states in the first line, Miday Station - located within the Jenatris Cloud. (Varaan)


"You're a sysop"

Which means what, exactly? (expectations, responsibilities, abilities) (Varaan)

Okay...now I'm lost. What's going on? (Varaan)

Reworking categories, etc

Looks like you're making a lot of work for yourself. Having fun? (Varaan)

How was it not read easily? Everything was linked, and had individual menus for easy roaming? (BTW, not offended, and could have done this FOR you if you had asked) (Varaan)

Ya. I remember the Sept message. I just thought that using the menus would be easier and less confusing than having to navigate through the different categories, so I didn't worry about coming up with 8 or 9 new categories. But I can do that just as easily, so no worries from here on out. (BTW, thanks) (Varaan)

Ship Classes

I tend to agree, admiral. Though I never set those "examples in out fleet" pages up, so I was a little hesitant to change them. But I've got write ups for a "TONNE" of ship classes, and I think it would be easier to have write ups for them, and have a spot on that classes page that says "examples in out fleet" with links. - Varaan 22:55, 14 JAN 2006 (EST)

I agree, admiral. If we're only having a picture or two and a list of OUR ship examples, it's not worthwhile. However, what "I" am adding is quite a bit of other information on mostly non-canon classes that somethimes can't be found other places on the internet. I view this as a type of advertising for the group. If we have information that people can search for and find, they might stick around and join SB118. If however, our pages simply dump them to one of the other sites, they may never return. Now, if you were politely and subtly asking me to stop what I was doing, then I will - no hard feelings. If we're just talking about redirecting on the canon stuff, I can do that too. Don't pussyfoot, I'm not good at reading subtext. :)

- Varaan 13:20, 15 Jan 2006 (EST)

Redirects

Admiral, I'm trying to get rid of "redirect" pages (they're unnecessary if you link properly). Where was it necessary to have "Challenger" and "Independence" redirects? I thought I had cleaned all of them up. - Varaan 15:15, 29 Jan 2006 (EST)

I've been using the "what links here" in the toolbox to clean up the redirects. Geez, am I working at cross-purposes or what! :)

- Varaan 15:23, 29 Jan 2006 (EST)

Wallace menu

Would you mind if I changed the pic, that's probably my least favourite of all the images on ST:Australia... - Jay 10:20, 9 February 2006 (CST)