User talk:Varaan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(Ship classes) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: Dunno... you're the first one :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 20:35, 21 Oct 2005 (CDT) | : Dunno... you're the first one :) --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 20:35, 21 Oct 2005 (CDT) | ||
== Ship classes == | |||
Wouldn't we be better off just putting all the ships on one page, each with a subheading or something? I think the only time we really need a whole page for a vessel is when it's non-canon. Seems a bit superfluous to have all these ship pages that just have "examples within our fleet" when we can put all of them into a page with subheadings. Thoughts? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 19:05, 14 January 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 01:05, 15 January 2006
Training/Missions
Were we planning on revamping the missions? I thought we were just talking about revising the tutorials? --Wolf 23:37, 19 Aug 2005 (CDT)
- Let's start with the tutorials. We can move on to missions after that. I don't want us to be working on too many things at once. I think we can still test-run the new mission(s) in the meantime, though. --Wolf 22:45, 20 Aug 2005 (CDT)
You're a sysop
yay! --Wolf 21:28, 20 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- Dunno... you're the first one :) --Wolf 20:35, 21 Oct 2005 (CDT)
Ship classes
Wouldn't we be better off just putting all the ships on one page, each with a subheading or something? I think the only time we really need a whole page for a vessel is when it's non-canon. Seems a bit superfluous to have all these ship pages that just have "examples within our fleet" when we can put all of them into a page with subheadings. Thoughts? --Wolf 19:05, 14 January 2006 (CST)