User talk:Varaan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Ship classes: Compromise.) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:: Hehe... no, that was not my intention. I just want to make sure we don't have 50 individual pages for ships with very little information or information that is better found elsewhere. So why don't we do this: let's have one page for each "type" of ship -- Explorers, Cruisers, whatever. On each of these pages we'll have a list of each ship class in a subheading. For all the canon ships which we don't have any information on and/or information is better found elsewhere, we'll just have a small picture and a list of "examples within our fleet." For all non-canon ships and/or ships where we have the best information or unique information, we'll do the same thing, but also do like Wikipedia does and have a link which states "Main articles: <nowiki>[[Name of Noncanon Class]]</nowiki>". That way, the appearance is uniform, and we don't have unnecessary pages, and it's easy to find the ships. Agreed? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:39, 15 January 2006 (CST) | :: Hehe... no, that was not my intention. I just want to make sure we don't have 50 individual pages for ships with very little information or information that is better found elsewhere. So why don't we do this: let's have one page for each "type" of ship -- Explorers, Cruisers, whatever. On each of these pages we'll have a list of each ship class in a subheading. For all the canon ships which we don't have any information on and/or information is better found elsewhere, we'll just have a small picture and a list of "examples within our fleet." For all non-canon ships and/or ships where we have the best information or unique information, we'll do the same thing, but also do like Wikipedia does and have a link which states "Main articles: <nowiki>[[Name of Noncanon Class]]</nowiki>". That way, the appearance is uniform, and we don't have unnecessary pages, and it's easy to find the ships. Agreed? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:39, 15 January 2006 (CST) | ||
::: The starship classes page is looking much better. --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 01:32, 29 January 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 07:32, 29 January 2006
Training/Missions
Were we planning on revamping the missions? I thought we were just talking about revising the tutorials? --Wolf 23:37, 19 Aug 2005 (CDT)
- Let's start with the tutorials. We can move on to missions after that. I don't want us to be working on too many things at once. I think we can still test-run the new mission(s) in the meantime, though. --Wolf 22:45, 20 Aug 2005 (CDT)
You're a sysop
yay! --Wolf 21:28, 20 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- Dunno... you're the first one :) --Wolf 20:35, 21 Oct 2005 (CDT)
Ship classes
Wouldn't we be better off just putting all the ships on one page, each with a subheading or something? I think the only time we really need a whole page for a vessel is when it's non-canon. Seems a bit superfluous to have all these ship pages that just have "examples within our fleet" when we can put all of them into a page with subheadings. Thoughts? --Wolf 19:05, 14 January 2006 (CST)
- Well, if you remember the discussion we had with Maximoff, I'm really not interested in having all of the canon stuff on this wiki, because there are other places (DITL.org, MemoryAlpha, Wikipedia) that have better, more complete listings for these things. So, if we do want to have a list of ship classes on here, that's fine by me. My only objection is that we don't need a seperate page for each ship class if there's only "examples within our fleet" and a picture or two. They can all go on one page, then, and make it easier to access all the information. --Wolf 12:05, 15 January 2006 (CST)
- Hehe... no, that was not my intention. I just want to make sure we don't have 50 individual pages for ships with very little information or information that is better found elsewhere. So why don't we do this: let's have one page for each "type" of ship -- Explorers, Cruisers, whatever. On each of these pages we'll have a list of each ship class in a subheading. For all the canon ships which we don't have any information on and/or information is better found elsewhere, we'll just have a small picture and a list of "examples within our fleet." For all non-canon ships and/or ships where we have the best information or unique information, we'll do the same thing, but also do like Wikipedia does and have a link which states "Main articles: [[Name of Noncanon Class]]". That way, the appearance is uniform, and we don't have unnecessary pages, and it's easy to find the ships. Agreed? --Wolf 12:39, 15 January 2006 (CST)
- The starship classes page is looking much better. --Wolf 01:32, 29 January 2006 (CST)