|
|
| (201 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| New page: [[Creation and Upkeep of Ship Histories]]
| | ''This page has been truncated to include only discussions from 2016 onward. ([[/archive1|Archive 1]], [[/archive2|Archive 2]]).'' --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] /<sup>[[User talk:FltAdml. Wolf|talk page]]</sup> 01:55, 1 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| == New Page == | | == ILI icon == |
| | Fixed. If you're curious about what those numbers mean in the template: [[Template:Crop]]. [[User:Rich|'''♫ Rich''']] ▪ [[118Wiki:Administrators|<small>118Wiki Administrator</small>]] ▪ [[User talk:Rich|<small>Send Message</small>]] 21:33, 15 October 2015 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| [[The Fighter Guide]]
| | == Re: Star Trek an Introduction == |
|
| |
|
| == ILI ==
| | I've saved the bits, if you want to purge them, that's fine by me [[User:Ceciri|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri|talk]]) 22:27, 19 December 2015 (CST) |
|
| |
|
| I can't edit the ILI list... [[Aenar]] are missing from the list, I've made a basic page for them
| | == A few questions about files on the wiki == |
|
| |
|
| Thanks, I'll bear that in mind, although all I personaly have borrowed from Memory Alpha so far is the Aenar picture. - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 14:48, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)
| | The file is : File:Sb118-banner-468x60.jpg. It appears not to work. Should I go ahead and remove it from the publicity products page and delete the file? In addition, I ran across: |
|
| |
|
| I did notice that and corrected as quickly as humanely possible - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 14:50, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)
| | http://wiki.starbase118.net/wiki/index.php/File:Trident_Ribbon.jpg and I'm not really sure what to do with it. [[User:Ceciri|Ceciri]] ([[User talk:Ceciri|talk]]) 20:13, 30 December 2015 (CST) |
| | |
| == User Page ==
| |
| | |
| Sorry about that - will be keeping Pietmaximoff then. It didn't strike me until after I made the new UserName that I didn't really need it anyway. --[[User:Pietmaximoff|Lt Pietro Maximoff]] 07:16, 16 Aug 2005 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| == Training Area ==
| |
| | |
| Admiral, the tutorials section and the mission section should be separate, don't you think? Could we have a mission section too? (Varaan)
| |
| | |
| Parker and I had written up two new missions, long ago when we were talking about "spring cleaning" the missions area. We each had one run through and then the entire project got shelved. (Varaan)
| |
| | |
| == Guide to USS Wallace ==
| |
| | |
| I had thought about that, but we probably need to get the DS17 guide in a respectable condition first... - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 17:14, 21 Aug 2005 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Ship Classes==
| |
| I tend to agree, admiral. Though I never set those "examples in out fleet" pages up, so I was a little hesitant to change them. But I've got write ups for a "TONNE" of ship classes, and I think it would be easier to have write ups for them, and have a spot on that classes page that says "examples in out fleet" with links.
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 22:55, 14 JAN 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| : I agree, admiral. If we're only having a picture or two and a list of OUR ship examples, it's not worthwhile. However, what "I" am adding is quite a bit of other information on mostly non-canon classes that somethimes can't be found other places on the internet. I view this as a type of advertising for the group. If we have information that people can search for and find, they might stick around and join SB118. If however, our pages simply dump them to one of the other sites, they may never return. Now, if you were politely and subtly asking me to stop what I was doing, then I will - no hard feelings. If we're just talking about redirecting on the canon stuff, I can do that too. Don't pussyfoot, I'm not good at reading subtext. :)
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 13:20, 15 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| ==Redirects==
| |
| Admiral, I'm trying to get rid of "redirect" pages (they're unnecessary if you link properly). Where was it necessary to have "Challenger" and "Independence" redirects? I thought I had cleaned all of them up.
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 15:15, 29 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| : I've been using the "what links here" in the toolbox to clean up the redirects. Geez, am I working at cross-purposes or what! :)
| |
| - [[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 15:23, 29 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == Wallace menu ==
| |
| | |
| Would you mind if I changed the pic, that's probably my least favourite of all the images on ST:Australia... - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 10:20, 9 February 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :How does that look? I actually have the full version of this pic as my background on my PC :) - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 04:48, 11 February 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| I had to upload the image myself as it hadn't been done yet. The background is white, not transparent and the image is a jpg as I got a very blocky pic as a gif. - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 05:38, 14 February 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| == Articles for deletion ==
| |
| | |
| I've added the delete template to 3 pages, 2 of them are part of my characters pages as I'm restructuring it and the other is one of the pages which I moved yesterday which you missed when you deleted the rest of the old Challenger NPC pages. Could you delete them please as I haven't got the capability to do it myself. Thanks - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 17:29, 18 February 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| Category:Articles to be Deleted; Now contains 2 articles which were wrongly named and 2 articles relating to my character which I've rewritten as subpages to my userpage and wish to move into the place of the old article. I'll move my sub-pages accross but I need the current pages deleted before I can do so. Could you please do this for me. Thanks - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 09:18, 13 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| <nowiki>:)</nowiki> Like the new link on your user page. Thanks for that. - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 02:59, 14 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| ==Spatial Regions==
| |
| Admiral, I was wondering if it would be worth our while to create a new category for, like, "Campaign Regions" such as the Ithassa Region, the Par'tha Expanse, the Solerian Sector (and all its smaller associates), and maybe even throw in Fleetwide Plot Arc stuff, and anything else people have come up with, so it could be easier to see where a vessel could go for a mission that's been preestablished and partly fleshed out? I thought I'd ask first in case it sounded like (in your opinion) that it wouldn't get used that much. What do you think? <br>-[[User:Varaan|Varaan]] 07:35, 11 May 2006 (CDT)
| |
