10,278
edits
Talk:Aenar: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not really sure we need to have an article for this "sub-species", as I'm not sure if they are technically a distinct species, or just a different race. Just as there are Asians, Africans, Europeans, etc. They are all races of humans. I suppose the question is, would this species have it's own scientific name? I.e.- we are all homo sapiens, regardless of our race. So are the Aenar all the same "species"? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:50, 31 Jul 2005 (CDT) | I'm not really sure we need to have an article for this "sub-species", as I'm not sure if they are technically a distinct species, or just a different race. Just as there are Asians, Africans, Europeans, etc. They are all races of humans. I suppose the question is, would this species have it's own scientific name? I.e.- we are all homo sapiens, regardless of our race. So are the Aenar all the same "species"? --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 12:50, 31 Jul 2005 (CDT) | ||
The Aenar have physical differences... the clip in each antenae for example. The lack of pigment making thier skin far more pale is another. | |||
It's possibly like comparing Homo Sapiens to Homo Neanderthalensis... both Human, but different sub-species with distinct differences. - [[User:Salak|Salak]] 13:38, 31 Jul 2005 (CDT) | |||