Talk:Cart'hen I: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I should point out that Cart'hen I may fall foul of the Cart'hen stars [[wp:Roche limit|Roche limit]] and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers 3rd Law of Planetary motion, I've calculated a "year" of just 32.1 Seconds, so I'm guessing I've put the code into Excel wrong somewhere! - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 12:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | I should point out that Cart'hen I may fall foul of the Cart'hen stars [[wp:Roche limit|Roche limit]] and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers 3rd Law of Planetary motion, I've calculated a "year" of just 32.1 Seconds, so I'm guessing I've put the code into Excel wrong somewhere! From the radius figure, I'd guess it's a month at most though. - [[User:Salak|<font color="maroon">Lt. Salak</font>]][[Image:Nav-paladin.jpg|35px|USS Independence-A]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Salak|Talk]]</i></sup> 12:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 18:18, 28 March 2008
I should point out that Cart'hen I may fall foul of the Cart'hen stars Roche limit and would thus be unable to hold itself together by its own gravity. Using Keplers 3rd Law of Planetary motion, I've calculated a "year" of just 32.1 Seconds, so I'm guessing I've put the code into Excel wrong somewhere! From the radius figure, I'd guess it's a month at most though. - Lt. SalakTalk 12:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)