User talk:R.bejain: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Not trying to be rude, just trying to tidy up...) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Characters category== | ==Characters category== | ||
Is [[Kassa Quay]] a primary character? Just curious b/c she is listed in the "Characters" category. Up until now, I think we have kept that primarily for primary characters. I suppose that's a bit vague though... hm... --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 20:30, 8 May 2006 (CDT) | Is [[Kassa Quay]] a primary character? Just curious b/c she is listed in the "Characters" category. Up until now, I think we have kept that primarily for primary characters. I suppose that's a bit vague though... hm... --[[User:FltAdml. Wolf|Wolf]] 20:30, 8 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Not trying to be rude, just trying to tidy up... == | |||
The page [[Introduction to the Ithassa Region]] seems to cover the same ground as the previously established [[Ithassa Region]] page is intending to. Would it be possible to try and integrate the information you put up with that already on the wiki? The layout of the Ithassa Region section was open to discussion a little while ago and a re-write had already been started, but not yet complete. The discussion can be viewed [[Talk:Guide to the Ithassa Region|here]]. Thanks - [[User:Salak|Jay]] 13:29, 11 May 2006 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:27, 11 May 2006
Characters category
Is Kassa Quay a primary character? Just curious b/c she is listed in the "Characters" category. Up until now, I think we have kept that primarily for primary characters. I suppose that's a bit vague though... hm... --Wolf 20:30, 8 May 2006 (CDT)
Not trying to be rude, just trying to tidy up...
The page Introduction to the Ithassa Region seems to cover the same ground as the previously established Ithassa Region page is intending to. Would it be possible to try and integrate the information you put up with that already on the wiki? The layout of the Ithassa Region section was open to discussion a little while ago and a re-write had already been started, but not yet complete. The discussion can be viewed here. Thanks - Jay 13:29, 11 May 2006 (BST)